ReviewPeerJ2025
The role of T cells in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
Review in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treadmill Exercise Alleviates Motor Deficits of PD Mice via Regulating STING-Mediated Valeric Acid-Th17/Treg-IL-17A Axis.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Article
- Zebrafish Models of Parkinson's Disease: From Pathogenesis to Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Parkinson's Disease: Conventional Pharmacotherapy, Drug Delivery Innovations, and Emerging Therapeutic Targets.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Comparative Analysis of T-Cell Signatures and Astroglial Reactivity in Parkinson's Pathology Across Animal Models with Distinct Regenerative Capacities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current pharmacological treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) predominantly employs dopaminergic agents aimed at enhancing cerebral dopamine levels. While these therapeutic strategies provide symptomatic relief, their palliative nature is frequently associated with dose-dependent complications, including gastrointestinal disturbances, emetic symptoms, and motor complications such as dyskinesia. Moreover, the honeymoon period of drugs has greatly limited their clinical application. The multifactorial etiology of PD continues to challenge researchers, yet substantial evidence implicates α-synuclein as a critical pathogenic mediator. Emerging findings suggest that dysregulated neuroimmune interactions constitute a fundamental mechanism in PD progression, where chronic immune activation appears particularly detrimental to neuronal survival. Notably, neuroinflammatory cascades coupled with compromised blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity create a self-perpetuating cycle of neural degeneration, wherein α-synuclein-specific T cells exacerbate disease pathology while regulatory T cell populations demonstrate potential immunomodulatory capacities. This review systematically examines the mechanistic interplay involving neuroinflammatory cascades, BBB compromise, central nervous system (CNS) immunoregulation, and T lymphocyte subpopulations (including regulatory T cells) in the pathogenesis of PD. By synthesizing current evidence, we aim to establish a conceptual framework supporting the investigation of cellular immunity-based therapies for PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.