Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40827211›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2025

Systemic therapy strategies for elderly patients with gastric cancer.

Yukiya Narita, Kei Muro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Longitudinal trajectories of nutritional markers in patients with de novo Stage IV gastric cancer: a descriptive analysis using one-year survival as a reference.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yukiya NaritaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1, Kanokoden, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8018-0077
Kei MuroDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common malignancy and a leading cause of cancer mortality globally, with particularly high rates in East Asia. The median age at diagnosis is approximately 68 years, and over half of the cases occur in patients aged >65 years. As the life expectancy increases, the proportion of elderly patients with GC increasing, and this population presents unique treatment challenges. Conventional chemotherapy regimens were developed primarily for younger populations and may not be optimal for older adults due to age-related declines in organ function, comorbidities, and differing treatment preferences. The present review discusses the epidemiologic treatment trends among elderly GC patients, the limitations of defining "elderly" solely by chronological age, and the importance of comprehensive geriatric assessments, including the G8 screening tool, for guiding therapy. Evidence indicates that doublet chemotherapy combinations-such as S-1 plus oxaliplatin or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin-benefit fit elderly patients, whereas frailer individuals may be better suited for monotherapy (e.g., S-1 or capecitabine alone) or de-intensified regimens. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents, such as zolbetuximab, are now used in clinical practice, evidence from clinical trials specific to elderly patients remains severely limited. In addition, microsatellite instability-high tumors, more common in older patients, show exceptional responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors, suggesting a potential for chemotherapy-free regimens. This review highlights the importance of personalized, geriatric-guided treatment strategies and discusses pivotal clinical trials involving elderly GC patients. Future research should focus on optimizing regimens and integrating targeted therapies to improve outcomes while minimizing toxicity in this growing population. This review focuses primarily on treatment strategies for elderly patients with advanced or metastatic GC, where systemic therapy decisions must balance efficacy with age-related vulnerabilities.

Indexed as

chemotherapyelderly patientgastric cancerMSI-Htreatment strategies

Identifiers

PMID40827211
PMCPMC12357996

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.