ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
AI-based detection of neutrophil dysplasia: an accessible and sensitive model for MDS diagnosis from peripheral blood.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myelodysplastic syndrome / neoplasm (MDS) presents a diagnostic challenge due to the need of expert morphological analysis, and the reliance on genomic analysis of collected bone marrow material for the definite diagnosis. This study aimed to facilitate this process by developing a computer vision AI-based model that is capable of diagnosing MDS from images from peripheral blood smears (PBS). We used a cohort of 43,371 neutrophils from 84 MDS and 60 non-MDS samples to train a neutrophil classifier to differentiate between dysplastic and non-dysplastic cells. The model was initially fed with PBS images from patients with prominent MDS (pMDS) and further refined to detect non-prominent MDS (npMDS), i.e., without clear-cut dysplastic features in their neutrophils. The model learning was only based on the single-cell annotation of the neutrophils from pMDS, without human-generated morphological features as input. The trained neutrophil classifier achieved an overall accuracy of 94%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.95 and 0.94, respectively. On a patient-level, the model correctly identified 91 out of the 94 samples, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.98 and 0.96, respectively, and AUC of 0.999. In npMDS, 43 out of the 44 samples were correctly identified. Our study demonstrates the potential of AI-based models to improve the efficiency of MDS diagnostics. Our model runs on standard CPUs, offering an accessible solution that can be integrated into existing clinical workflows and potentially reduces the dependence on specialized morphologists and genomic analysis from bone marrow punctures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.