Evidence mapPaperPMID 40828296Full record

ReviewArchives of microbiology2025

Microbial proteases as emerging anti-inflammatory therapeutics: a comprehensive review.

Amarthya Suresh, Mohanasrinivasan Vaithilingam

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amarthya SureshSchool of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamil Nadu, India.
Mohanasrinivasan VaithilingamSchool of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamil Nadu, India. v.mohan@vit.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7638-351X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammation is the body's natural defence response to pathogens or tissue injury. This review explores the therapeutic potential of microbial proteases in managing inflammation, focusing on their molecular mechanisms, production strategies, and emerging role as alternatives to conventional anti-inflammatory drugs. While standard treatments such as Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and glucocorticoids act by inhibiting cyclooxygenase enzymes and prostaglandin synthesis, their prolonged use is often associated with adverse effects, including gastrointestinal ulcers, renal toxicity, and cardiovascular complications. Microbial proteases, by contrast, offer advantages such as catalytic specificity, biochemical diversity, and ease of large-scale production through fermentation and genetic modification. In addition to examining market trends of the currently available enzyme-based therapies, this review highlights several key considerations limiting their clinical adoption-namely, immune system sensitivity, poor stability under physiological conditions, limited comparative performance data against other enzyme sources, and challenges in regulatory approval and targeted delivery. It also uniquely highlights underexplored bacterial genera and production challenges, offering a translational outlook that bridges laboratory findings with real-world therapeutic applications. Advances in strain engineering, encapsulation techniques, and synthetic biology approaches hold promise for enhancing the safety, effectiveness, and precision of microbial protease-based therapeutics in inflammation control.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsBacteriaBacterial ProteinsInflammationPeptide HydrolasesAnimalsHumansAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBacterial ProteinsPeptide HydrolasesAnti-inflammatory drugCyclooxygenaseInflammationMicrobial proteaseNSAIDs

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.