ArticleJournal of plant research2025
Genomic analysis highlights the conservation significance of Torenia concolor (Linderniaceae) from the periphery of its distribution range.
Article in Journal of plant research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biodiversity status assessments are typically conducted on a regional basis. Consequently, there are numerous species that are rare in one region but ubiquitously present in another country or administrative region. Correctly assessing the conservation status and value of such "endangered species" is essential to achieve better biodiversity conservation through the appropriate and efficient use of socioeconomic resources. A comparative genomic analysis was conducted on Torenia concolor, which is widely distributed in Southeast and East Asia, but has a limited population in Japan, specifically on Amami Oshima Island. This population has not yet been established as a conservation priority due to the possibility that it may have originated from cultivated plants. We hypothesized that the population was not due to a human-induced distribution; indeed, our findings indicate that the Amami Oshima population is derived from a natural distribution and is phylogenetically unique, retaining comparable genetic diversity with more abundant populations and exhibiting no increase in deleterious variations in their genome. These findings highlight the unique conservation significance of the Amami Oshima population. Furthermore, the findings suggest that this population, being genetically robust, may be sustainably conserved through minimal intervention strategies, such as maintaining current habitat conditions and monitoring population size, as the accumulation of deleterious mutations is comparable to that of the Taiwanese population. This study highlights the importance of accurate assessment of genomic status and contributes to a broader understanding of conservation strategies for regionally rare species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.