Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40828463›Full record

GuidelineIntensive care medicine2025

European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline on fluid therapy in adult critically ill patients: Part 3-fluid removal at de-escalation phase.

Marlies Ostermann, Fayez Alshamsi, Antonio Artigas Raventos, Maurizio Cecconi, Carole Ichai, Christina Jones, Manu L N G Malbrain, Xavier Monnet, Marek Nalos, Zhiyong Peng and 8 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Intensive care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Stepwise fluid management in critical illness.Intensive care medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Marlies Ostermann *Department of Intensive Care, King's College London, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK. Marlies.Ostermann@gstt.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9500-9080
Fayez Alshamsi *Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-9121-4279
Antonio Artigas RaventosDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Corporacion Sanitaria Universitaria Parc Tauli, Institut d'Investigació I Innovació Parc Tauli (I3PT-CERCA), CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8029-1017
Maurizio CecconiBiomedical Sciences Department, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4376-6538
Carole IchaiDépartement d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Université Côte d'Azur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0251-1280
Christina JonesICUsteps Support Charity, Kemp House, London, UK.
Manu L N G MalbrainFirst Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin (MUL), Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1816-5255
Xavier MonnetAP‑HP, Service de Médecine Intensive‑Réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 4 CORREVE, IHU PROMETHEUS, FHU SEPSIS, CARMAS, Université Paris‑Saclay, Le Kremlin‑Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6820-2678
Marek NalosDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7977-9410
Zhiyong PengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3873-9607
Carmen A PfortmuellerDepartment of Intensive Care, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0326-2770
John ProwleFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5002-2721
Otavio RanzaniInstitut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4677-6862
Manu Shankar-HariCentre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5338-2538
Adrian WongDepartment of Critical Care, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4968-7328
Morten Hylander Møller *Department of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6378-9673
Daniel De Backer *Department of Intensive Care, CHIREC Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9841-5762
European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis is the third of three parts of the clinical practice guideline from the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) on fluid management in adult critically ill patients. This part addresses fluid removal in the de-escalation phase of shock management.

methodsThis guideline was formulated by an international panel of clinical experts, methodologists, and patient representatives. A literature search was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults published up to February 2025. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was applied to evaluate the certainty of evidence and to move from evidence to decision.

resultsBased on data from 13 RCTs, the panel issued three conditional recommendations. The panel suggested de-escalation of fluid therapy over no de-escalation in critically ill adults after the acute phase of fluid resuscitation (low certainty evidence). They suggested protocolized fluid removal by diuretics over usual care in critically ill patients after the acute phase of fluid resuscitation (moderate certainty evidence). A conditional recommendation was issued against the routine use of ultrafiltration or extracorporeal fluid removal in critically ill adults after the acute phase of fluid resuscitation, without other indication for RRT (low certainty evidence). There was limited evidence to comment on fluid removal in specific patient cohorts.

conclusionsThis ESICM guideline provides three recommendations to inform clinicians on fluid removal during the de-escalation phase in critically ill patients with shock who no longer need fluid resuscitation.

Indexed as

Critical CareCritical IllnessFluid TherapyAdultEuropeHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSocieties, MedicalDe-resuscitationDiureticsExtracorporeal fluid removalFluidFluid removalUltrafiltration

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.