ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Antithrombotic therapy delays due to neurosurgical interventions after traumatic vertebral artery injuries increases stroke risk.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTraumatic vertebral artery injury (TVAI) poses a risk for ischemic stroke, often requiring prompt antithrombotic therapy. However, when concomitant neurosurgical intervention is necessary, concerns regarding perioperative bleeding frequently lead to delays in antithrombotic initiation. This study evaluates the impact of delayed antithrombotic therapy on stroke risk in TVAI patients undergoing neurosurgical interventions.
methodsA retrospective review was conducted of a TVAI registry over 7 years (2016-2023) at a level 1 trauma center for patients who were treated with antithrombotics for stroke prevention. Baseline demographics, vertebral artery injury characteristics, concomitant injury characteristics, acute management and outcomes were compared between surgical and non-surgical cohorts. Statistical analyses included Student's t-test, Chi-square tests, relative risk (RR), and attributable risk (AR).
resultsAmong the 121 patients, 44 (36.4%) underwent neurosurgical procedures. The surgical cohort experienced an average 2-day delay in antithrombotic initiation (p < 0.001). The incidence of stroke in the neurosurgical intervention group was 20.5%, which was significantly higher than 5.19% in the control group (p = 0.016), with an associated RR of 3.94 and excess AR of 15.3%. No significant differences in baseline antithrombotic use, injury severity, or mortality were observed between cohorts.
conclusionDelayed antithrombotic initiation in TVAI patients undergoing neurosurgical intervention is associated with a nearly fourfold increased risk of stroke. Future multi-center studies should explore neurosurgical strategies allowing safer early antithrombotic initiation in this patient population. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40828475What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.