Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40828538›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Genetic Testing of Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Israel.

Dalit May, Ruth Barshir, Moni Shahar, Adam J Rose, Dorit Shmueli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dalit MayClalit Health Services, Jerusalem, Israel.
Ruth BarshirThe Tel Aviv University Center for AI and Data Science, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Moni ShaharThe Tel Aviv University Center for AI and Data Science, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Adam J RoseHebrew University School of Public Health, Jerusalem, Israel.
Dorit ShmueliClalit Health Services, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Genetic testing is the criterion standard for diagnosing neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) used as a first-line test for autism, intellectual disability, or global developmental delay. Despite advancements in genetic testing technologies and integration into health care systems, data on clinical use remain limited. Objective: To evaluate genetic counseling and testing rates in patients with major NDDs and these individuals' clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This longitudinal, retrospective, population-based cohort study analyzed electronic health records of individuals born between 2000 and 2020 and insured by Clalit Health Services, the largest health maintenance organization in Israel. Follow-up extended through December 6, 2023. Patients diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability or global developmental delay, epilepsy, or cerebral palsy (major NDDs) were included. Exposure: Neurodevelopmental disorders. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome was the rate of genetic counseling, CMA testing, and NDD diagnosis measured using descriptive statistics. Results: Of 2 406 763 individuals born in Israel between 2000 and 2020, 25 403 (1.06%; mean [SD] age at December 6, 2023, 11.9 [4.3] years; 68.7% male) were diagnosed with a major NDD. The cohort was predominantly of middle socioeconomic status (56.5%), and autism was the most common diagnosis (40.6%). Among 18 709 children indicated for CMA (ie, those with autism, intellectual disability or global developmental delay, or multiple diagnoses), 7233 (38.7%) received genetic counseling, and 4592 (24.5%) underwent testing (63.5% of those counseled). Genetic testing rates were higher in children with multiple co-occurring NDDs (1478 of 4005 [36.9%]) compared with those with autism alone (2189 of 10 311 [21.2%]). Genetic counseling rates were lowest for cerebral palsy and epilepsy as guidelines were less established. Genetic evaluation rates increased with more recent birth cohorts. While evaluation rates were similar across subpopulations for children with a diagnosis, initial autism diagnosis rates were 54% to 83% lower in lower socioeconomic status and minority populations, limiting access to counseling and testing. Conclusions and Relevance: A key finding of this cohort study was that more than one-third of patients who received genetic counseling did not undergo testing. Furthermore, low socioeconomic status and minority populations experienced drastic underdiagnosis of autism. These findings underscore the need for national initiatives to improve awareness and access to counseling and testing for all major NDDs and the recognition of autism in minority groups.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingGenetic TestingNeurodevelopmental DisordersAdolescentAdultAutism Spectrum DisorderChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIntellectual DisabilityIsraelLongitudinal StudiesMaleRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40828538
PMCPMC12365703

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.