Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830134›Full record

ReviewZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2025

[Research progress in auxiliary components of nerve conduit for treating peripheral nerve injuries].

Chaocao Nong, Haodong Lin

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chaocao NongTrauma Center, Affiliated First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201600, P. R. China.
Haodong LinTrauma Center, Affiliated First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201600, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To review recent research progress in the use of auxiliary components of nerve conduits for the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries. Methods: An extensive review of recent domestic and international literature was conducted to evaluate the role of auxiliary components in nerve conduits for peripheral nerve repair, with a focus on their effects and underlying mechanisms. Results: By incorporating auxiliary components such as bioactive molecules, therapeutic cells, and their derivatives, nerve conduits can create a more biomimetic regenerative microenvironment. This is achieved by providing neurotrophic support, modulating the immune microenvironment, improving blood and oxygen supply, and offering directional guidance for nerve regeneration. Consequently, the nerve conduit is transformed from a simple physical scaffold into an active, bio-functional repair system, which enhances the effectiveness for PNI. Conclusion: While nerve conduits augmented with auxiliary components demonstrate improved effectiveness, further advancements are required in drug delivery systems and the integration of cellular components. Moreover, most current studies are based on animal or

Indexed as

Guided Tissue RegenerationNerve RegenerationPeripheral Nerve InjuriesTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansPeripheral NervesBiocompatible Materialsguided tissue regenerationNerve conduitnerve regenerationperipheral nerve injury

Identifiers

PMID40830134
PMCPMC12367412

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.