ArticleScientific reports2025
Ecoepidemiology and zoonotic risk of intestinal parasites in humans and domestic dogs in marginalized coastal communities of Ecuador.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging evaluation and management of liver infections: a multimodality review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- High Prevalence and Regional Heterogeneity of CanineAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Prevalence and genetic diversity of intestinal parasites in Xilingol League herbivores, Inner Mongolia, Northern China.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intestinal parasites are a global public health concern, affecting both humans and animals, particularly in neglected and underserved communities. These parasites can lead to severe health complications and have zoonotic potential, especially in areas with close human-animal interactions and poor sanitation. This study investigates the ecoepidemiology and zoonotic relationship of intestinal parasites in humans and their domestic dogs in marginalized urban and rural sectors of the Ecuadorian coast. A total of 500 domestic dogs and 160 human participants from four neglected areas of Guayas province were studied between April and October 2024. Fecal samples were collected and analyzed using coproparasitic techniques (direct, flotation, sedimentation, and modified Baermann), followed by morphometric confirmation. Sociodemographic surveys, environmental assessments, and epidemiological indicators were also collected. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests and logistic regression models, were used to identify associations between parasite prevalence and socioenvironmental variables. The overall prevalence of intestinal parasites was 31.87% in humans and 78% in domestic dogs. The most common parasites in humans were Entamoeba coli (18.13%), Entamoeba. histolytica (10%), and Hymenolepis nana (3.75%). In dogs, Ancylostoma caninum (53.6%), Taenia spp. (Echinococcus granulosus) (15.2%) and Toxocara canis (12.4%), were the most prevalent. Zoonotic parasitic diseases identified included cutaneous larva migrans, hydatidosis, and strongyloidiasis. Significant associations were found between parasitic infections and factors such as water source, sanitation infrastructure, barefoot walking, and peridomiciliary habitat of dogs. The findings highlight a high burden of intestinal parasitism in both humans and dogs in neglected coastal communities of Ecuador, driven by inadequate sanitation, poor socioeconomic conditions, and environmental risk factors. The study underscores the need for integrated One Health approaches, including education, improved hygiene, and routine deworming, to prevent zoonotic transmission and improve public health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.