ArticleScientific reports2025
The intraoperative hemodynamic and clinical research of three direct bypasses in moyamoya disease a prospective cohort of 98 cases.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel superficial temporal artery patency concept of cerebral revascularization for patients with moyamoya disease: a multicenter study.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2026Article
- Postoperative perfusion volume on territorial arterial spin labeling provides an exploratory risk signal for cerebrovascular autoregulation failure after moyamoya revascularization: a prospective physiological study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of this study was to investigate clinical and hemodynamic differences in moyamoya disease patients underwent direct bypass using one donor-one recipient (1D1R), one donor-two recipients (1D2R), and two donors-two recipients (2D2R) bypass. To the authors' knowledge, this represents the largest series reported to date. Clinical and radiographic data were collected for 98 patients using 1D1R (28 cases), 1D2R (46 cases), and 2D2R (24 cases) bypasses. The patients' demographic information, clinical presentations, associated medical conditions, intraoperative hemodynamics, and postoperative hemispheric perfusion were obtained from reviewing medical records, intraoperative microvascular Doppler ultrasonography, and CT perfusion scans. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complication, bypass vessel patency, and good neovascularization among the 3 groups (P > 0.05). When postoperative complications occurred, patients in the 1D2R group had a lower modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score and a shorter duration of symptoms compared to those in the 1D1R group (P < 0.05). A significant difference was observed in the intraoperative mean velocity values of the donor vessel and the recipient artery (RA) in the parietal lobe among the three groups, with the 1D1R group showing the highest values (P < 0.05). Under blood pressure control, there was significant difference in the volumes of the hypoperfusion area, infarct core, and penumbra among the three groups (P < 0.05). The application of 1D1R, 1D2R, and 2D2R techniques resulted in distinct clinical and hemodynamic outcomes. Patients containing dual RAs were likely to have more extensive perfusion changes and better prognosis in the event of surgical complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.