ReviewNature reviews. Urology2026
Urinary bladder cancer needs more attention - recommendations for health care professionals and politicians in the European Union.
Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of RNA processing-related gene-based bladder cancer subtypes for prognosis and immune landscape assessment.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- NOP2-mediated 5-methylcytosine Regulates Lipid Metabolism Reprogramming to Prime Tumors for Ferroptosis in Bladder Cancer Progression.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer is a crucial health priority of the current European Commission and a pillar of a strong European Health Union. However, policy measures targeting cancer in the EU do not approach all types of cancer equally. Bladder cancer is the fifth most common cancer in Europe. Although bladder cancer is associated with one of the highest lifetime costs of any cancer, research funding is among the lowest. This imbalance has led to an alarming stagnation in the availability of diagnostic tools, which negatively affected the prognosis and treatment options for bladder cancer, and resulted in complex pathways for patients. The lack of bladder-cancer awareness drastically hinders early detection. Furthermore, insufficient understanding of gender differences in bladder-cancer symptoms exacerbates the gender gap, leading to worse outcomes for women. After the European elections in 2024 and the learnings from Europe's Beating Cancer Plan, additional effort is needed to inform the policymakers in Brussels and the Member-State capitals to consider an EU agenda with ambitious policy actions targeting neglected cancers, such as bladder cancer, and close the cancer-care gap by supporting awareness and education and by ensuring access to high-quality diagnostic tools, care and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40830244What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.