Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830244›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2026

Urinary bladder cancer needs more attention - recommendations for health care professionals and politicians in the European Union.

Thorsten H Ecke, Sarah Collen, Alex Filicevas, Theodoros Yfantis, Florence Le Calvez-Kelm, Bente Thoft Jensen, Hein van Poppel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thorsten H EckeDepartment of Urology, Helios Hospital, Bad Saarow, Germany. thorsten.ecke@helios-gesundheit.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0787-2763
Sarah CollenEuropean Association of Urology Policy Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8407-4511
Alex FilicevasWorld Bladder Cancer Patient Coalition, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0004-8049-3438
Theodoros YfantisWorld Bladder Cancer Patient Coalition, Brussels, Belgium.
Florence Le Calvez-KelmGenomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0063-5068
Bente Thoft JensenDepartment of Urology Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Hein van PoppelEuropean Association of Urology Policy Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a crucial health priority of the current European Commission and a pillar of a strong European Health Union. However, policy measures targeting cancer in the EU do not approach all types of cancer equally. Bladder cancer is the fifth most common cancer in Europe. Although bladder cancer is associated with one of the highest lifetime costs of any cancer, research funding is among the lowest. This imbalance has led to an alarming stagnation in the availability of diagnostic tools, which negatively affected the prognosis and treatment options for bladder cancer, and resulted in complex pathways for patients. The lack of bladder-cancer awareness drastically hinders early detection. Furthermore, insufficient understanding of gender differences in bladder-cancer symptoms exacerbates the gender gap, leading to worse outcomes for women. After the European elections in 2024 and the learnings from Europe's Beating Cancer Plan, additional effort is needed to inform the policymakers in Brussels and the Member-State capitals to consider an EU agenda with ambitious policy actions targeting neglected cancers, such as bladder cancer, and close the cancer-care gap by supporting awareness and education and by ensuring access to high-quality diagnostic tools, care and treatment.

Indexed as

European UnionHealth PersonnelPoliticsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsHumans

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.