Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830338›Full record

ReviewCell death discovery2025

The ATF4-glutamine axis: a central node in cancer metabolism, stress adaptation, and therapeutic targeting.

Xing Yan, Changhong Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell death discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Enhancement of Therapeutic mRNA Translation in Cellular Stress Conditions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Subcellular Stress Markers in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Targeting the Glutaminolysis Pathway in Glaucoma-Associated Fibrosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xing YanThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University Thoracic surgery, DaLian, Liaoning, PR China.
Changhong LiuThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University Thoracic surgery, DaLian, Liaoning, PR China. 17709870870@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6549-4193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the center of tumor(neoplasm) metabolic adaptation lies activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4), a key regulator that orchestrates Glutamine (Gln) uptake, utilization, and redox balance under conditions of nutrient deprivation and oxidative stress. This review explores how ATF4 integrates environmental and cellular stress signals to drive Gln metabolic processes, enabling tumor survival, metabolic reprogramming, and immune evasion. The ATF4-Gln axis emerges as a pivotal vulnerability in cancer metabolic processes. Preclinical studies of small-molecule inhibitors and synthetic derivatives disrupting this pathway show promising results. Understanding the intricate interplay between ATF4, Gln metabolic processes, and cancer progression provides valuable insights for novel therapeutic strategies. Future research must address tumor heterogeneity and metabolic flexibility to fully harness the potential of ATF4-centered therapies. However, challenges such as off-target effects of ATF4 inhibitors and metabolic plasticity in tumors remain critical barriers. Future studies integrating multi-omics approaches and AI-driven drug discovery are warranted to overcome these hurdles.

Identifiers

PMID40830338
PMCPMC12365302

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.