ArticleBMC biology2025
Adaptive genetics reveals constraints on protein structure/function by evolving E. coli under constant nutrient limitation.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvolution of microbes under laboratory selection produces genetically diverse populations, owing to the continuous input of mutations and to competition among lineages. Whole-genome whole-population sequencing makes it possible to identify mutations arising in such populations, to use them to discern functional modules where adaptation occurs, and then map gene structure-function relationships. Here, we report on the use of this approach, adaptive genetics, to discover targets of selection and the mutational consequences thereof in E. coli evolving under chronic nutrient limitation.
resultsReplicate bacterial populations were cultured for ≥ 300 generations in glucose limited chemostats and sequenced every 50 generations at 1000X-coverage, enabling identification of mutations that rose to ≥ 1% frequency. Thirty-nine genes qualified as high value targets of selection, being mutated far more often than would be expected by chance. A majority of these encode regulatory proteins that control gene expression at the transcriptional (e.g., RpoS and OmpR), post-transcriptional (e.g., Hfq and ProQ), and post-translational (e.g., GatZ) levels. The downstream effects of these regulatory mutations likely impact not only acquisition and processing of limiting glucose, but also assembly of structural elements such as lipopolysaccharide, periplasmic glucans, and cell surface appendages such as flagella and fimbriae. Whether regulatory or structural in nature, recurrent mutations at high value targets tend to cluster at sites either known or predicted to be involved in RNA-protein or protein-protein interactions.
conclusionsOur observations highlight the value of experimental evolution as a proving ground for inferences gathered from traditional molecular genetics. By coupling experimental evolution to whole-genome, whole-population sequencing, adaptive genetics makes it possible not only the genes whose mutation confers a selective advantage, but also to discover which residues in which genes are most likely to confer a particular type of selective advantage and why.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.