Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830806›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Randomized adaptive assessment of post COVID syndrome treatments (RAPID): a study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, controlled adaptive platform trial of treatment options for Post Covid Syndrome (PCS) on patients physical function including the first intervention specific appendix RAPID_REVIVE (reducing inflammatory activity in patients with PCS).

Lisa Weipert, Ralph G Telgmann, Gabriele Anton, Thomas Asendorf, Irina Chaplinskaja-Sobol, Sandra Ciesek, Oliver A Cornely, Sonja Drescher, Carsten Finke, Tim Friede and 17 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Lisa WeipertDepartment II of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ralph G TelgmannClinical Trials Unit, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Gabriele AntonMedical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Thomas AsendorfDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Irina Chaplinskaja-SobolUniversity Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Medical Informatics, Göttingen, Germany.
Sandra CiesekInstitute for Medical Virology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Oliver A CornelyUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Translational Research, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECA), Cologne, Germany.
Sonja DrescherDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Carsten FinkeDepartment of Neurology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Tim FriedeDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Julia GrothHelmholtz Centre Munich, Institute of Epidemiology, Department of Molecular Epidemiology, Munich, Germany.
Sabine HanßUniversity Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Medical Informatics, Göttingen, Germany.
Wolfgang HoffmannInstitute of Community Medicine, Department of Healthcare Epidemiology and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Cynthia HuberDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Thomas IlligHannover Medical School, Hannover Unified Biobank, Hannover, Germany.
Monika KrausHelmholtz Centre Munich, Institute of Epidemiology, Department of Molecular Epidemiology, Munich, Germany.
Dagmar KreftingUniversity Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Medical Informatics, Göttingen, Germany.
Sebastian KuhnInstitute for Digital Medicine, University Hospital Giessen-Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Andreas MuehlerImmunic AG, Lochhamer Schlag 21, Gräfelfing, 82166, Germany.
Matthias NauckInstitute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Jens SchallerInstitute for Cardiovascular Computer-Assisted Medicine, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ann-Cathrin SchmidtDepartment II of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Georg SchmidtKlinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Birgit SawitzkiInstitute of Medical Immunology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ralf TostmannClinical Trials Unit, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Heike ValentinInstitute of Community Medicine, Department of Healthcare Epidemiology and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Maria VehreschildDepartment II of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. vehreschild@med.uni-frankfurt.de.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01KX2121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of patients recovers from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) without obvious sequelae, but a significant proportion suffers long-term consequences which have been termed post COVID syndrome (PCS). Despite a wide range of considerations on treatment options in PCS and a significant number of trials initiated, only very few results from randomized controlled trials are currently available. In conclusion, there is an evident medical need to identify treatments for patients with PCS.

methodsThe primary objective of the platform trial RAPID is to assess the impact of different PCS treatments on the overall physical function of patients. Designed as a master protocol, RAPID contains all information that is generic to this adaptive platform trial. Current and future study treatments are specified in intervention-specific appendices (ISA). The first ISA, RAPID_REVIVE is presented in this manuscript. General sections of the master protocol are named as such. RAPID_REVIVE is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II clinical trial evaluating antiviral PCS treatment with vidofludimus calcium (IMU-838). Patients are randomized at a 1:1 ratio to 45 mg/day vidofludimus calcium (22.5 mg for the first 7 days) or placebo during an initialization phase and thereafter using a response-adaptive randomization procedure. The trial includes a screening period of 7 days, a double-blind treatment period of 56 days and a follow-up period of 28 days. The primary outcome is the intra-patient change in physical function measured by the Short Form-36 Physical Function (SF-36-PF) from baseline to day 56. Secondary endpoints include mental and physical health, intensity of fatigue, severity of mental disorder symptoms, and cognitive function. DISCUSSION: PCS is a major problem for global health care and the identification of treatment options is urgently needed. Currently, PCS patients are in a situation without evidence-based treatment options, and quality of life, and often mental health are significantly impaired. The purpose of RAPID is to establish an adaptive platform trial protocol which will concert and quicken clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different potential treatments for PCS with the aim to expand the very limited evidence base for the treatment of PCS.

trial registrationEU Clinical Trials Register (CTIS) ID: 2024-511628-16-00 (RAPID_REVIVE). Registered on 18.03.2024.

Indexed as

COVID-19Adaptive Clinical Trials as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAdaptive Platform StudyCognitive functionFatiguePhysical functionPost COVID syndromeVidofludimus calcium

Identifiers

PMID40830806
PMCPMC12366011

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.