Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831484›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Coaching unified sports: associations between perceived athlete improvement, barriers, and coach attitudes across five European countries.

Maciej Wilski, Piotr Urbański, Roxana Ossian, Gabriela Papp Eniko, Nina Bracanovic Milovic, Ivan Radovic, Veronica Sedlackova, Eva Gazova, Nadira Sabanovic, Kada Delic Selimovic and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Maciej WilskiDepartment of Adapted Physical Activity, Poznan University of Physical Education, Poznan, Poland.
Piotr UrbańskiDepartment of Adapted Physical Activity, Poznan University of Physical Education, Poznan, Poland.
Roxana OssianSpecial Olympics Romania, Bucharest, Romania.
Gabriela Papp EnikoSchool Center for Inclusive Education, Târgu Mureș, Romania.
Nina Bracanovic MilovicSpecial Olympics Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro.
Ivan RadovicSpecial Olympics Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro.
Veronica SedlackovaSpecial Olympics Slovakia, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Eva GazovaSpecial Olympics Slovakia, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Nadira SabanovicSpecial Olympics Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Kada Delic SelimovicDepartment of Sport Sciences, Panevropski Univerzitet Apeiron, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Velibor SrdicDepartment of Sport Sciences, Panevropski Univerzitet Apeiron, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Srboljub VukovicDepartment of Sport Sciences, Panevropski Univerzitet Apeiron, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Damir AhmicDepartment of Education, Univerzitet u Travniku, Travnik, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Vaiva AbramaviciuteSpecial Olympics Lithuania, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Daiva DabrilieneSpecial Olympics Lithuania, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Ausra KriskoviecieneSpecial Olympics Lithuania, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Anna NadolskaDepartment of Adapted Physical Activity, Poznan University of Physical Education, Poznan, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to examine how perceived athlete improvement, perceived barriers to implementation, and selected coaching characteristics are associated with coaches' attitudes toward Unified Sports programs. The investigation focused on understanding the psychological and contextual factors that influence inclusive coaching engagement within a multi-country sample, rather than comparing national differences directly. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 102 coaches involved in Unified Sports programs in five European countries. Participants completed a standardized questionnaire assessing their attitudes toward inclusion, perceived improvement in athletes with developmental disabilities and their non-disabled partners, perceived implementation barriers, and personal coaching background. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to identify predictors of coaching attitudes. Results: Perceived improvement in athletes with developmental disabilities was the strongest and most consistent predictor of positive coaching attitudes. Coaches who reported greater perceived progress in these athletes were more likely to endorse inclusive beliefs. In contrast, perceived improvement in non-disabled partners, although generally rated highly, did not significantly predict coaching attitudes. Interestingly, coaches with prior experience working in disability sports and those with familial relationships to participating athletes expressed more skeptical views, suggesting that emotional involvement or cumulative exposure may introduce attitudinal strain. Although institutional, social, and logistical barriers to Unified Sports were widely recognized by participants, these factors did not independently predict attitudes once other variables were controlled for. Conclusion: The findings underscore the motivational role of observed progress among athletes with disabilities in shaping coach engagement and suggest that experiential factors such as previous involvement and personal ties may carry unanticipated emotional or structural challenges. These insights point to the importance of designing coach education and support programs that not only promote technical competence but also address emotional resilience and contextual demands. Strengthening these components may enhance the sustainability and effectiveness of Unified Sports initiatives worldwide.

Indexed as

attitudes toward inclusiondevelopmental disabilitiesinclusive coachingperceived barriersunified sports

Identifiers

PMID40831484
PMCPMC12359056

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.