Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831922›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025

Umbrella review of photodynamic therapy for cancer: efficacy, safety, and clinical applications.

Hanhan Chen, Honglin Li, Hui-Jie Li, Zhen Zhang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hanhan Chen *Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Honglin Li *Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Hui-Jie LiDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Zhen ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) can target cancers, while causing little damage to surrounding healthy tissues. Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy, safety, and clinical applications of PDT across cancer types. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched to April 7, 2024 for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of PDT in patients with cancer. Quality assessment was performed using Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2, overlapping meta-analyses were handled using Corrected Covered Area, and data re-synthesized using a random-effects model. Results: Eighteen publications met the inclusion criteria. There is weak evidence that PDT combined with biliary stenting improves overall survival (OS) relative to stenting alone (hazard ratio (HR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.73), while PDT with chemotherapy improved OS (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.15-0.87), without increasing adverse events. Weak evidence indicated lower clearance and complete response rates and higher recurrence rates of non-melanoma skin cancers, particularly basal cell carcinoma (BCC), after PDT than following surgery. In squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), complete response rates (relative risk 2.75; 95% CI 2.19-3.45) were higher for laser-assisted than conventional PDT; PDT provided better cosmetic outcomes than other therapies. Single-arm meta-analyses demonstrated some efficacy of PDT for treating cutaneous metastatic SCC, oral SCC, prostate cancer, and bladder cancer. Conclusion: PDT shows potential benefits in several cancers, especially for non-melanoma skin cancer and unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. While newer PDT strategies may improve outcomes, more high-quality trials are needed to confirm its role across cancer types. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024538243, identifier CRD42024538243.

Indexed as

cancermeta-analysisphotodynamic therapyphotosensitizerumbrella review

Identifiers

PMID40831922
PMCPMC12358287

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.