ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2025
Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a primary liver cancer typically diagnosed at advanced stages, limiting treatment options and reducing survival rates. Targeted therapy presents a promising strategy to improve outcomes. This study aims to identify novel molecular biomarkers influencing ICC development and explore their roles in tumor progression. Methods: Data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases were analyzed using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to identify genes related to tumor metastasis and recurrence. Survival analysis and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) assessed the relationship between gene expression and survival, as well as associated signaling pathways. Cellular experiments, including small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown, cell viability assays, Transwell migration assays, and flow cytometry, were performed. Results: The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that ICC patients with high N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) expression had significantly shorter survival times than those with low expression ( Conclusion: NAT2, a novel therapeutic target, holds significant potential to improve the prognosis of ICC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.