Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40833323›Full record

Trial reportInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

Dynamics of the EZ/RPE Loss Ratio on OCT Over Time During Geographic Atrophy Progression and Treatment With Pegcetacoplan.

Julia Mai, Gregor S Reiter, Sophie Riedl, Wolf-Dieter Vogl, Amir Sadeghipour, Alex McKeown, Emma Foos, Hrvoje Bogunovic, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03525600 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Sham-Controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Pegcetacoplan Therapy With Sham Injections in Patients With Geographic Atrophy (GA) Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorApellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ran2018 to 2022Enrolled621ConditionsGeographic AtrophyArmsAPL-2, Sham Procedure
NCT03525613 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Sham-Controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Pegcetacoplan Therapy With Sham Injections in Patients With Geographic Atrophy (GA) Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorApellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ran2018 to 2022Enrolled637ConditionsGeographic AtrophyArmsAPL-2, Sham Procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julia MaiOPTIMA - Laboratory for Ophthalmic Image Analysis, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gregor S ReiterOPTIMA - Laboratory for Ophthalmic Image Analysis, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sophie RiedlOPTIMA - Laboratory for Ophthalmic Image Analysis, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolf-Dieter VoglRetInSight, Vienna, Austria.
Amir SadeghipourRetInSight, Vienna, Austria.
Alex McKeownApellis Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Emma FoosApellis Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Hrvoje BogunovicInstitute of Artificial Intelligence / Center for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ursula Schmidt-ErfurthOPTIMA - Laboratory for Ophthalmic Image Analysis, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the change of ellipsoid zone (EZ)/retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) loss ratio on optical coherence tomography (OCT) in geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration using deep learning-based analysis. Methods: OCT volumes of patients from the OAKS (NCT03525613) and DERBY (NCT03525600) trials, two phase III prospective randomized trials of GA treated with sham, intravitreal pegcetacoplan monthly (PM) and every other month (PEOM) were included. RPE and EZ loss were measured on OCT using validated deep learning-based algorithms. Pooled study eyes were divided into 4 quartiles determined by EZ/RPE loss ratios on OCT at baseline, month 12, and month 24. The change in ratio with treatment and its association with further disease progression and therapeutic response were analyzed. Results: Eight hundred eighty-nine OCT volumes were included. Overall, quartiles shifted downward at 12 and 24 months, representing a moderate decrease in disease activity, particularly in treated eyes. The EZ/RPE loss quartiles at month 12 were prognostic for further disease progression in the sham eyes for RPE and EZ loss. There was a higher likelihood of a quartile decrease in the PM and PEOM groups versus the sham at month 24 (P value quartile shift PM versus sham = 0.14, PEOM versus sham = 0.0053). Conclusions: The change in EZ/RPE loss ratios at month 12 remained to be predictive for disease activity and therapeutic response, providing insights into disease mechanisms and relevant guidance for GA management in clinical practice. The EZ/RPE loss ratio decreased either due to advanced GA or induced by therapy in treated patients versus sham.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsGeographic AtrophyRetinal Pigment EpitheliumTomography, Optical CoherenceAgedAged, 80 and overDeep LearningDisease ProgressionFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleProspective StudiesVisual AcuityAngiogenesis Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID40833323
PMCPMC12383881

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.