ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2025
Transferability of genomic prediction models across market segments in potato and the effect of selection.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging tradition and innovation: a review of computer simulations in plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic prediction (GP) can help increase the efficiency of breeding programs, as genotypes can be selected based on their predicted performance. However, to the best of our knowledge, this procedure is not yet routine in commercial breeding programs in tetraploid organisms like potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). The objectives of this study were to (i) Estimate the prediction accuracy for 26 different potato traits in a panel of about 1000 genotypes based on 202,008 single nucleotide polymorphisms, (ii) Evaluate the influence of the size and constitution of the training set on the prediction accuracy, and (iii) Investigate how the effect of selection in the training set influences the outcome of GP. GP revealed high prediction accuracies using genomic best linear unbiased prediction. Our results indicated that a training set of 280-480 clones and 10,000 markers was sufficient. Prediction within a specific market segment led to a higher prediction accuracy compared to adding clones from other market segments to the training set or to predict between different market segments. Lastly, we found a higher prediction accuracy when in a training set of selected clones, i.e., a training set that consists of clones with high trait values, 20% of the clones were replaced by clones that were sampled from the clones that showed the lowest 10% trait values. This observation shows that clones from advanced breeding stages can be used as training set, if some clones specifically from the other side of the distribution range are added to the training set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.