Evidence mapPaperPMID 40833514Full record

ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2025

Locally delivered 1% metformin gel improves periodontal parameters: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kata Sára Haba, Bulcsú Bencze, Gábor Kammerhofer, Márta Ujpál, Dorottya Bányai, Péter Hermann, Sarolta Antal, Klaudia Lipták, Laura Lipták, Zoltán Géczi and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kata Sára HabaDepartment of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary. haba.kata@semmelweis.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8926-2171
Bulcsú BenczeDepartment of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8965-6589
Gábor KammerhoferDepartment of Oro-Maxillofacial Surgery and Stomatology, Semmelweis University, Mária Street 52, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3131-1920
Márta UjpálDepartment of Oro-Maxillofacial Surgery and Stomatology, Semmelweis University, Mária Street 52, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.
Dorottya BányaiDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0985-4737
Péter HermannDepartment of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5510-397X
Sarolta AntalInstitute of Biophysics and Radiational Biology, Semmelweis University, Tűzoltó Str. 37-47, 1094, Budapest, Hungary.
Klaudia LiptákDepartment of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5177-1390
Laura LiptákDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5470-3469
Zoltán GécziDepartment of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3799-9535
Tamás HegedüsDepartment of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6440-4683
Ádám VéghDepartment of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.
Dóra HaluszkaInstitute of Biophysics and Radiational Biology, Semmelweis University, Tűzoltó Str. 37-47, 1094, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3760-2016
Dániel VéghDepartment of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, 1088, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2836-6747
Hamdan AlghamdiPeriodontics and Dental Implants, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, 2454, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8247-3367

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeApproximately 19% of the global adult population is affected by periodontal diseases. Healing is a protracted process that is significantly influenced by the patient's motivation, proficiency, and cooperation. The prevalence of periodontal diseases in patients with diabetes mellitus is extremely high, and the relationship is bidirectional. In previous investigations, metformin (MF), a biguanide antidiabetic medicine, has demonstrated promising results when administered locally to periodontal defects. The study aimed to systematically assess available literature that evaluate the effectiveness of 1% metformin gel in the treatment of periodontal disease. We attempted to include clinical trials on patients with periodontitis treated with local administration of 1% metformin gel, compared to a placebo.

methodsUsing identical MeSH terms, we conducted a systematic search in three databases. Our analysis encompassed human studies that measured the periodontal pocket depth, the clinical attachment level, and the depth of the intra-bony defect. Meta-analyses were carried out using random effects model to compare the mean differences between the study group, which received 1% MF gel locally in addition to traditional scaling and root planing (SRP), and the control group, which received a placebo in addition to conventional treatment.

resultsFollowing the selection procedure, six articles were selected for inclusion in our meta-analysis, out of the 246 articles identified through the systematic search. After three and six months of follow-up, meta-analyses revealed statistically significant differences between the control and study groups. The overall effect for PD was a 1.33 mm reduction (95% confidence interval (CI): -1.66; -1.01) after three months and 1.87 mm (-2.24; -1.39) after six months. The overall effect of CAL was 1.80 mm (-2.26; -1.34) after three months and 2.14 mm (-2.71; -1.58) after six months. The change in IBD after a six-month follow-up was 1.16 mm (-1.40; -0.92).

conclusionThe application of 1% MF gel enhances the healing process in periodontal diseases, when employed in conjunction with conventional therapy.

Indexed as

Attachment lossMetforminPeriodontal pocket depthPeriodontitis

Identifiers

PMID40833514
PMCPMC12367589

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.