ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2026
Risking for Good: A Three-Wave Within-Person Analysis of the Reciprocal Relations Among Prosocial Risk Taking, Positive Risk Taking, and Prosocial Leadership.
Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disentangling the dynamic directional associations between positive and negative risk-taking behaviors and academic development in adolescents: a four-wave longitudinal analysis.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Longitudinal and Daily Links Between Impulsivity and Prosocial Behavior: The Moderating Role of Positive Risk-Taking.Journal of adolescence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescence is a developmental stage characterized by increased engagement in risk taking, which can serve adaptive functions such as identity exploration and social integration. However, most existing research has focused on negative risk taking, with limited attention to how positive and prosocial risk taking contribute to adolescents' leadership development. Moreover, previous studies on adolescent risk taking have predominantly relied on cross-sectional designs, leaving within-person developmental processes underexplored. This study utilized three-wave longitudinal data (N = 554; mean age = 13.35 years, SD = 0.35 years; 50% girls) to examine the relations among positive risk taking, prosocial risk taking, and prosocial leadership. Participants were assessed at three time points: July 2020 (T1), January 2021 (T2), and July 2021 (T3), each wave separated by six months. The Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model (RI-CLPM) was applied to distinguish within-person effects from between-person effects. Results indicated that, at the within-person level, both positive risk taking and prosocial risk taking predicted subsequent increases in prosocial leadership, which in turn, predicted further increases in positive and prosocial risk taking. Conversely, negative risk taking was not significantly associated with prosocial leadership at the within-person level. These findings suggest that participation in positive and prosocial risk-taking activities facilitates the cultivation and reinforcement of leadership skills among adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40833525What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.