ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
ConPath 2.0: an optimized consensus strategy for assessing the potential pathogenicity of hRPE65 missense variants.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contexthRPE65 is an essential enzyme in the retinoid visual cycle. Numerous missense variants of hRPE65 have been linked to retinal disorders, such as retinitis pigmentosa and Leber congenital amaurosis. Moreover, many hRPE65 missense mutations are currently classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) due to insufficient evidence for a definitive pathogenicity classification. Addressing this limitation is critical for enabling accurate diagnoses and identifying suitable candidates for gene therapy. For this reason, we developed a hRPE65-tailored computational strategy, based on a consensus of multiple in silico pathogenicity predictions, enabling a rapid and reliable evaluation of the potential pathogenic effect of over 200 hRPE65 VUS. The analysis provided valuable insights to support the reclassification of these variants and assist clinicians in assessing their suitability for gene therapy.
methodsIn this study, we optimized our recently developed ConPath approach, which combines variant pathogenicity predictions from 19 different computational tools. In particular, we expanded the pool of predictive tools combined in the approach to 27, incorporated 3D-based methods that employ structural information for their prediction, and we refined the statistical framework for selecting the most reliable tools within an extended pool of more than 70 different methods. The tools were assessed based on their ability to discriminate pathogenic from benign hRPE65 missense mutations using an updated and expanded dataset of known hRPE65 variants. The resulting enhanced strategy, ConPath 2.0, was applied to the 210 hRPE65 VUS reported in the ClinVar database.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40833643What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.