Evidence mapPaperPMID 40833871Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2025

Predicting cardiac and renal responses to sacubitril/valsartan with a mathematical model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

John S Clemmer, Michael E Hall, Jordan H Mallette, W Andrew Pruett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John S ClemmerDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2250-2960
Michael E HallDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5733-1025
Jordan H MalletteDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, United States.
W Andrew PruettDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, United States.

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115428 · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · 2025 to 2025
$3.6M
Pilot Projects ProgramP30GM149404 · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · 2025 to 2025
$1.2M
Hypertension and Cardiorenal Research Training ProgramT32HL105324 · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · 2025 to 2025
$819k
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL105324NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM104357NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM149404NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115428NIMHD NIH HHS R00 MD014738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) now accounts for most cases of HF. The majority of patients with HFpEF have hypertension (HTN) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), which increase their risk of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality and further complicates the management of these patients. Recently, clinical trials investigating sacubitril/valsartan, a dual angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), demonstrated greater lowering of blood pressure (BP) and N-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with HFpEF as compared with ARB alone. However, effects on CV morbidity or mortality have not been convincing in the ARNI clinical trials thus far, and the responses to ARNI when specific HFpEF comorbidities are present, such as CKD, are not well-defined. To examine the detailed physiological responses that occur in the heart and kidney during ARNI therapy in HFpEF, we used the large mathematical model of physiology, HumMod. As compared with the 36-wk responses to ARB treatment, the simulation predicted greater reductions in cardiac pressures, left ventricular wall stress and mass, BP, and NT-proBNP levels with ARNI treatment, similar to the results from PARAMOUNT and PARAGON-HF trials. Our model predicted that ARNI increased incidence of glomerular HTN, albuminuria, and nephron damage, despite improved glomerular filtration rate and greater decreases in cardiac mass and BP, irrespective of salt intake, warranting further attention for endpoint selection in future clinical studies of these therapies. This physiological model offers a new promising approach to guide future clinical decision making for ARNI therapy in HFpEF.

Indexed as

AminobutyratesAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsHeartHeart FailureKidneyModels, CardiovascularProtease InhibitorsStroke VolumeTetrazolesValsartanVentricular Function, LeftBiphenyl CompoundsBlood PressureDrug CombinationsGlomerular Filtration RateAminobutyratesAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsDrug CombinationsNatriuretic Peptide, BrainNeprilysinPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)Protease Inhibitorssacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combinationTetrazolesValsartanARNIchronic kidney diseasecomputer modelheart failureHFpEF

Identifiers

PMID40833871
PMCPMC12462727

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.