ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2025
Predicting cardiac and renal responses to sacubitril/valsartan with a mathematical model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Article in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy with sacubitril/valsartan vs. standard antihypertensive agents in hypertension: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) now accounts for most cases of HF. The majority of patients with HFpEF have hypertension (HTN) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), which increase their risk of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality and further complicates the management of these patients. Recently, clinical trials investigating sacubitril/valsartan, a dual angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), demonstrated greater lowering of blood pressure (BP) and N-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with HFpEF as compared with ARB alone. However, effects on CV morbidity or mortality have not been convincing in the ARNI clinical trials thus far, and the responses to ARNI when specific HFpEF comorbidities are present, such as CKD, are not well-defined. To examine the detailed physiological responses that occur in the heart and kidney during ARNI therapy in HFpEF, we used the large mathematical model of physiology, HumMod. As compared with the 36-wk responses to ARB treatment, the simulation predicted greater reductions in cardiac pressures, left ventricular wall stress and mass, BP, and NT-proBNP levels with ARNI treatment, similar to the results from PARAMOUNT and PARAGON-HF trials. Our model predicted that ARNI increased incidence of glomerular HTN, albuminuria, and nephron damage, despite improved glomerular filtration rate and greater decreases in cardiac mass and BP, irrespective of salt intake, warranting further attention for endpoint selection in future clinical studies of these therapies. This physiological model offers a new promising approach to guide future clinical decision making for ARNI therapy in HFpEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.