ArticlePloS one2025
Residential greenness and reduced depression during COVID-19: Longitudinal evidence from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrban greenness has several demonstrated mental health benefits, including lower rates of depression and loneliness. Few studies have evaluated the possible benefits of greenness on depression during the COVID-19 worldwide pandemic. We investigated this topic using a prospective cohort of Canadian adults.
methodsOur study population consisted of 13,130 participants, 50 years of age and older, of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Short Scale (CES-D-10) screening tool was used to determine whether individuals had depression at two-time points (pre-pandemic, and 6 months into the pandemic). Greenness was characterized using the maximum annual mean Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) (500m buffer) from the pre-pandemic residential address. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of depression during the pandemic in relation to an interquartile range increase in the NDVI.
resultsThe prevalence of depression increased nearly twofold between the pre-pandemic and pandemic surveys (8.5% to 16.5% for men; 14.4% to 27.1% for women). Irrespective of depression status before the pandemic, those with higher residential greenness had lower odds of depression during the pandemic. Among those 'not depressed' pre-pandemic, the odds ratio (OR) of depression during the pandemic in relation to an interquartile increase in the NDVI (0.06) was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85-0.97), while a weaker association was found for those depressed pre-pandemic (OR=0.96; 95% CI: 0.83-1.11). The inverse association between greenness and depression during the pandemic was strongest among those of lower socioeconomic status.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that green spaces in urban areas helped mitigate against depression during the pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.