ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2025
Barriers and facilitators for self-harm: development and validation of an instrument for health professionals.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
to develop and validate an instrument based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify barriers and facilitators perceived by health professionals in the prevention of self-harm. methodological study based on Pasquali's theoretical framework and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Face and content validations were performed through expert evaluation (n = 13) and construct validity, with health professionals (n = 91). Participants were selected by non-probabilistic convenience sampling. Data were collected on a virtual form and analyzed using the Content Validity Index (CVI), the First-Order Agreement (AC1) coefficient of concordance, and Horn's exploratory factor analysis. inter-rater agreement was considered moderate (AC1 = 0.52; SD = 0.04; 95% CI = 0.42 - 0.61; p = ≤ 0.005). After analysis with the target audience, three items were removed (KMO = < 0.6). Factor analysis identified three factors and 11 items, with the internal consistency of the instrument considered high (ω = 0.89). The final version was structured with 11 items on a Likert scale. the instrument is pioneering and accessible for the Brazilian context, with potential to identify barriers and facilitators self-harm prevention.
background(1) The instrument identifies barriers and facilitators for the prevention of self-harm.
background(2) The internal consistency of the instrument was considered high.
background(3) The analysis identified the following factors: knowledge and capacity, context and institutional support.
background(4) The instrument developed is easy to use and adaptable to different contexts in Brazil.
background(5) The instrument contributes to studies on the prevention of self-harm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.