Evidence mapPaperPMID 40835616Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning-based prediction model for post-stroke cerebral-cardiac syndrome: a risk stratification study.

Tingyu Zhang, Zelin Hao, Qunlian Jiang, Linhui Zhu, Lifang Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tingyu ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zelin HaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Qunlian JiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Linhui ZhuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Lifang YeHeart Center, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), No. 158 Shangtang Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China. yelifang@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCerebral-cardiac syndrome (CCS) is a severe cardiac complication following acute ischemic stroke, often associated with adverse outcomes. This study developed and validated a machine learning (ML) model to predict CCS using clinical, laboratory, and pre-extracted imaging features. A retrospective cohort of 511 post-stroke patients was analyzed. Data on demographics, laboratory results, imaging findings, and medications were collected. CCS diagnosis was based on cardiac dysfunction occurring after stroke, excluding pre-existing cardiac diseases. Five machine learning models, including Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, and Deep Neural Network, were trained on 80% of the data and tested on the remaining 20%. Discrimination was assessed by AUC (95% CI), calibration by Hosmer-Lemeshow test and Brier score, and thresholds by Youden's index. Model interpretability was evaluated using SHAP. On the test set, XGBoost achieved the highest discrimination (AUC 0.879; 95% CI 0.807-0.942), accuracy 0.825, precision 0.844, recall 0.675, and F1 score 0.750. Random forest followed closely (AUC 0.866; accuracy 0.845; precision 0.962; recall 0.625; F1 0.758). SVM and logistic regression yielded AUCs of 0.853 and 0.818, respectively. Calibration was optimal for SVM (HL p > 0.05; Brier 0.126) and random forest (HL p > 0.05; Brier 0.131). SHAP analysis identified D-dimer, ACEI/ARB use, HbA1c, C-reactive protein, and prothrombin time as top predictors. ML-based models accurately predict early CCS in ischemic stroke patients. XGBoost offers superior discrimination, while SVM and random forest demonstrate better calibration. Incorporation of these models into clinical workflows may enhance risk stratification and guide targeted preventive strategies.

Indexed as

Machine LearningStrokeAgedFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSupport Vector MachineCerebral-cardiac syndromeMachine learningRisk predictionSHAP analysisStroke

Identifiers

PMID40835616
PMCPMC12368185

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.