ArticleBritish journal of cancer2025
PROCC: a predictive score to identify KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer patients who are likely to obtain survival benefit from panitumumab treatment.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPractice guidelines recommend panitumumab with chemotherapy to treat KRAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, not all patients respond to this therapy. We propose a score termed "PROCC" to identify likely panitumumab responders.
methodsThe training (TRDS) and validation (VALDS) datasets included KRAS WT mCRC patients treated with panitumumab (P) plus chemotherapy (TRDS, FOLFOX4; VALDS, FOLFIRI). TRDS included 36 diverse features used to generate synthetic representations analyzed via machine learning (ML) to identify patient subgroups, which were correlated with PFS and OS. A multivariable logistic regression model identified independent predictors to develop a predictive score.
resultsML identified two subpopulations in TRDS: SP-A (n = 162) and SP-B (n = 298). Only SP-A patients under P/FOLFOX4 showed improved OS versus FOLFOX4 (HR 0.68; p = 0.04). CEA, ALP, LDH, and platelets at baseline were used to create a predictive score ("PROCC"). For TRDS, the score had an area under the curve of 0.81. PROCC ≥8.5 correlated with lower risks of progression (HR 0.67; p = 0.03) and death (HR 0.65; p = 0.04) for P/FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4. Validation in VALDS confirmed similar results with FOLFIRI.
conclusionsBased on four baseline parameters, PROCC may guide the selection of KRAS WT mCRC patients most likely to benefit from panitumumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.