Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40835751›Full record

ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025

Claudin-18.2 immunohistochemical evaluation in pancreatic cancer specimens: review and recommendations for routine testing and scoring.

Claudio Luchini, Kristina A Matkowskyj, Takeshi Kuwata, Teri A Longacre, Peter Schirmacher, Manabu Takamatsu, Josef Rüschoff, Matteo Fassan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Claudin 18.2 Targeting: A Pan-Cancer Perspective.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claudio LuchiniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Piazzale Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy. claudio.luchini@univr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4901-4908
Kristina A MatkowskyjDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Takeshi KuwataDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Teri A LongacreDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Peter SchirmacherInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Manabu TakamatsuDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Josef RüschoffDiscovery Life Sciences Biomarker Services, Kassel, Germany.
Matteo FassanDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), Surgical Pathology Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. matteo.fassan@unipd.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of claudin-18 (CLDN18) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has already entered routine diagnostic activity as a predictive biomarker for patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas. Of note, the CLDN18 gene encodes for 2 isoforms, claudin-18.1 (CLDN18.1) and 18.2 (CLD18.2). Recent evidence has shown CLDN18.2 can be expressed in a relatively high rate of cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Based on these findings, preclinical research has been conducted, and clinical trials are currently underway testing anti-CLDN18.2 targeted regimens for patients affected by locally advanced unresectable and metastatic PDAC. Notably, the therapeutic strategies with specific antibodies are directed against CLDN18.2, while the antibody for IHC recognizes both isoforms, CLDN18.1 and CLDN18.2. Since CLDN18.1 is not expressed in the stomach or in the pancreas, IHC for CLDN18 in these sites can be considered specific for the isoform CLD18.2. At this time, no specific practical testing or interpretation guidelines have been proposed in this setting. However, there are several preanalytical and analytical variables and key potential pancreas-specific pitfalls, such as the frequently diffuse and strong CLDN18.2 expression in PDAC precursors, which will likely interfere with adequate CLDN18 staining and interpretation. To overcome these issues and steer the standardization of CLDN18 evaluation within the PDAC framework, this manuscript provides practical guidance on CLDN18 testing and scoring. The adoption of a standardized approach will help align all the efforts, both in research and clinical trial settings to optimally guide the most appropriate patients for anti-CLDN18.2 targeted therapies in PDAC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalClaudinsImmunohistochemistryPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansBiomarkers, TumorClaudinsCLDN18 protein, humanCLDN18.2Immunohistochemistry, Predictive biomarkersPancreatic cancerPDAC

Identifiers

PMID40835751
PMCPMC12488767

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.