ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Integrating network pharmacology and molecular modeling to decipher the anti-esophageal squamous cell carcinoma mechanisms of Bidens pilosa L.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Garcinoic acid promotes ferroptosis-associated growth inhibition in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through an MDM2-associated mechanism.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Identification of replication factor C subunit 4 as a potential therapeutic target in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on bioinformatic analysis and machine learning.Discover oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bidens pilosa L (BL), known for its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer properties across multiple malignancies, was investigated for its potential therapeutic effects against esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Through integrative network pharmacology and computational approaches, 10 bioactive compounds from BL were identified from HERB 2.0, symMap, BATMAN-TCM (target prediction score cutoff = 20, adjusted P-value = 0.05 for target analyses), TCMSP (oral bioavailability ≥ 30% and drug likeness ≥ 0.18), and ETCM 2.0 databases, while 3,993 ESCC-associated targets were retrieved from OMIM, GeneCards, and DisGeNET. Cross-analysis revealed 214 shared targets, with tyrosine-protein kinase, epidermal growth factor receptor, and alpha serine/threonine-protein kinase emerging as central hubs in protein-protein interaction networks. Functional enrichment analysis highlighted significant involvement in cellular responses to hormone stimuli, nitrogen compounds, and phosphorylation, with key pathways including cancer, PI3K-Akt, and Ras signaling. Molecular docking demonstrated high-affinity binding of (2E)-2-(3,4-Dihydroxybenzylidene)-6,7-Dihydroxy-Benzofuran-3-One (− 10.4 kcal/mol), Luteolin (− 10.1 kcal/mol), and Okanin (− 9.7 kcal/mol) to matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9), specifically targeting catalytic residues GLU227 and TYR245. Quantum chemical calculations further revealed narrow HOMO-LUMO gaps for Luteolin (ΔE = 2.41 eV) and Okanin (ΔE = 2.93 eV), indicating high reactivity, while molecular dynamics simulations confirmed stable MMP9-ligand complexes (nearly − 200 kJ/mol), with Okanin exhibiting faster equilibration than Luteolin. The analysis of datasets from TCGA and GEO revealed that MMP9 is significantly upregulated in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma tissues compared to normal esophageal tissues. Meanwhile, Luteolin significantly inhibited the proliferation, migration, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) capabilities of ESCC in vitro experiments.These findings collectively suggest that BL exerts anti-ESCC effects in silico through multi-target synergy, with Luteolin and Okanin identified as promising MMP9 inhibitors, providing a mechanistic foundation for future drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.