Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40836294›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2025

Improving genomic prediction for plant disease using environmental covariates.

Charlotte Brault, Emily J Conley, Andrew C Read, Andrew J Green, Karl D Glover, Jason P Cook, Harsimardeep S Gill, Jason D Fiedler, James A Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating reaction norm and fixed effect models for genomic selection of end-use quality in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Charlotte BraultDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA. charlotte.brault@live.com.
Emily J ConleyDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Andrew C ReadUSDA-ARS, Plant Science Research Unit, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Andrew J GreenDepartment of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
Karl D GloverAgronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA.
Jason P CookPlant Sciences and Plant Pathology Department, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, 59717, USA.
Harsimardeep S GillDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Jason D FiedlerUSDA-ARS Cereal Crops Improvement Research Unit, Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center, Fargo, ND, USA. jason.fiedler@usda.gov.
James A AndersonDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.

Funding

US Wheat and Barley Scab Initiative 3060-21000-046-000D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFusarium Head Blight (FHB) is a destructive fungal disease affecting wheat and barley, leading to significant yield losses and reduced grain quality. Susceptibility to FHB is influenced by genetic factors, environmental conditions, and genotype-by-environment interactions (GxE), making it challenging to predict disease resistance across diverse environments. This study investigates GxE in a long-term spring wheat multi-environment uniform nursery trial focusing on the evaluation of resistant lines in northern US breeding programs.

resultsTraditionally, GxE has been analyzed as a reaction norm over an environment index. Here, we computed the environment index as a linear combination of environmental covariables specific to each environment, and we derived an environment relationship matrix. Three methods were compared, all aimed at predicting untested genotypes in untested environments: the widely used Finlay-Wilkinson regression (FW), the joint-genomic regression analysis (JGRA) method, and mixed models incorporating an environmental covariates matrix. These were benchmarked against a baseline genomic selection model (GS) without environmental covariates. Predictive abilities were assessed within and across environments. The results revealed that the JGRA marker effect method was more accurate than GS in within- and across-environment predictions, although the differences were small. The predictive ability slightly decreased when the target environment was less related to the training environments. Mixed models performed similarly to JGRA within-environment, but JGRA outperformed the other methods for across-environment predictions. Additionally, JGRA identified significant genetic markers associated with baseline FHB resistance and environmental sensitivity. Furthermore, location-specific genomic estimated breeding values were predicted, providing insights into genotype stability across varying locations.

conclusionThese findings highlight the value of incorporating environmental covariates to increase predictive ability and improve the selection of resistant genotypes for diverse, untested environments. By leveraging this approach, breeders can effectively exploit GxE interactions to improve disease management at no additional cost.

Indexed as

Disease resistanceGenomic predictionGenotype-by-environment interactionPlant breedingWheat

Identifiers

PMID40836294
PMCPMC12366029

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.