ReviewJournal of fish biology2025
Individual identification of bony fishes using unique body markings: Implications and applications.
Review in Journal of fish biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Individual identification of bony fishes using unique body markings: Implications and applications.Journal of fish biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The natural variation in animal body markings, such as spots, stripes and blotches, offers a powerful tool for researchers, conservationists, citizen scientists and resource managers to distinguish specific individuals within species. By building libraries of photo-identified individuals, we can track and differentiate individuals over time and space, thereby non-invasively and often cost-effectively studying species' biology and behaviour. This, in turn, enhances our understanding of species' ecological roles, and informs and supports effective conservation strategies. Although photo-identification has been successfully applied to various aquatic species, including cetaceans, sharks and rays, it remains surprisingly underutilised for bony fishes. Indeed, despite their striking diversity of colours and patterns, relatively few studies have used natural markings to non-invasively investigate bony fish biology and conservation. In this review, we highlight the potential of photo-identification as a valuable research and management tool for these fishes in both field and laboratory environments. We outline the scientific, practical and ethical benefits of this approach, illustrating how individual identification can advance our understanding of fish biology and support their conservation efforts. We also discuss previous applications of photo-identification in bony fishes, examine barriers to its broader adoption and address common misconceptions that may limit its use. We propose strategies to overcome these challenges driven by advancements in camera technology and artificial intelligence, and discuss scenarios where photo-identification may prove particularly effective. Through this review, we therefore aim to encourage the broader use of natural body markings as a non-invasive method in bony fish research, management and conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.