Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40837008›Full record

ArticleRehabilitation oncology (American Physical Therapy Association. Oncology Section)2024

Using the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System to Describe Experimental and Control Arms of a Clinical Trial for Breast Cancer Survivors.

Kathleen D Lyons, Tessa Hart, Sheel Singh, Jeremy Wolfberg, John Whyte, Stephen Wechsler, Susan H Lin, Susan E Fasoli, Jarrad H Van Stan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rehabilitation oncology (American Physical Therapy Association. Oncology Section), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kathleen D LyonsProfessor, Department of Occupational Therapy, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA.
Tessa HartScientist Emerita, Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA.
Sheel SinghDoctoral Student, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA.
Jeremy WolfbergResearch Speech-Language Pathologist, Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA.
John WhyteInstitute Scientist Emeritus, Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA.
Stephen WechslerPostdoctoral Research Fellow, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA.
Susan H LinAffiliate Associate Professor, Marymount University, Arlington, VA.
Susan E FasoliProfessor Emerita, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA.
Jarrad H Van StanAssociate Professor, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA.

Funding

Optimizing functional recovery of breast cancer survivorsR01CA225792 · NCI · MGH INSTITUTE OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS · PI LYONS, KATHLEEN DOYLE · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
RTSS-Voice: Towards a unified system to classify treatments for muscle tension dysphoniaR01DC020247 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Jarrad Van Stan · 2022 to 2026
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225792NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) provides a framework to decompose complex interventions into components, each defined by its known or hypothesized active ingredients. In addition to its value in planning new interventions and understanding existing ones, we suggest it can be used to help interpret findings of clinical trials and plan next steps in a research program. This paper presents an analysis in which we used the RTSS to retrospectively delineate targets and ingredients of an experimental treatment, Behavioral Activation and Problem-Solving (BA/PS), and then examined the attention control condition for overlapping ingredients that could clarify the control condition's unanticipated effects. Our BA/PS intervention had seven treatment components; three were unique to the BA/PS condition, but the attention control condition contained ingredients that mirrored those found in four of the BA/PS components. Our results illuminate the challenges of designing an adequate control condition for behavioral rehabilitation trials among survivors of cancer. This RTSS application was instrumental in refining our conceptual model and preparing for future research. It serves as a model for other cancer rehabilitation researchers, emphasizing the importance of intentional and transparent intervention specification to advance the field.

Indexed as

neoplasmsPlacebo effecttherapeutic alliance

Identifiers

PMID40837008
PMCPMC12362348

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.