ArticlePhotonics2025
Influence of Uncertainties in Optode Positions on Self-Calibrating or Dual-Slope Diffuse Optical Measurements.
Article in Photonics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Self-calibrating and dual-slope measurements have been used in the field of diffuse optics for robust assessment of absolute values or temporal changes in the optical properties of highly scattering media and biological tissue. These measurements employ optical probes with a minimum of two source positions and a minimum of two detector positions. This work focuses on a quantitative analysis of the impact of errors in these source and detector positions on the assessment of optical properties. We considered linear, trapezoidal, and rectangular optode arrangements and theoretical computations based on diffusion theory for semi-infinite homogeneous media. We found that uncertainties in optodes' positions may have a greater impact on measurements of absolute scattering versus absorption coefficients. For example, a 4.1% and 19% average error in absolute absorption and scattering, respectively, can be expected by displacing every optode in a linear arrangement by 1 mm in any direction. The impact of optode position errors is typically smaller for measurements of absorption changes. In each geometrical arrangement (linear, trapezoid, rectangular), we identify the direction of the position uncertainty for each optode that has minimal impact on the optical measurements. These results can guide the optimal design of optical probes for self-calibrating and dual-slope measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.