Evidence mapPaperPMID 40837435Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Dietary guidance on plant-based meat alternatives for individuals wanting to increase plant protein intake.

Virginia Messina, Nanci S Guest, Alison M Duncan, Ann Reed Mangels, Jack Norris, Matt Ruscigno, Andrea J Glenn, Taylor Wolfram, Christopher P F Marinangeli, Mark Messina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Virginia MessinaNutrition Matters, Inc., Pittsfield, MA, United States.
Nanci S GuestDepartment of Nutritional Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alison M DuncanDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Ann Reed MangelsRetired, Santa Cruz, CA, United States.
Jack NorrisVegan Outreach, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Matt RuscignoConsultant, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Andrea J GlennDepartment of Nutrition and Food Studies, New York University, New York, NY, United States.
Taylor WolframTaylor Wolfram PLLC, La Grange, IL, United States.
Christopher P F MarinangeliCentre for Regulatory Research and Innovation, Protein Industries Canada, Regina, SK, Canada.
Mark MessinaDirector of Nutrition Science and Research, Soy Nutrition Institute Global, Jefferson City, MO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new generation of plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) has entered the mainstream. These products contain concentrated sources of plant protein and are formulated to mimic the taste and texture of their meat-based counterparts, especially red meat. The increased availability of these products coincides with calls from health agencies to increase the dietary plant-to-animal protein ratio for health and environmental reasons. The role of PBMAs in achieving the goal of consuming more plant protein may be particularly important since consumption of whole plant foods, such as legumes, which includes pulses (e.g., beans, peas and lentils), is unlikely to increase without major public policy initiatives. Nevertheless, there is debate about the healthfulness of PBMAs and about whether the benefits associated with traditional plant-based diets emphasizing whole plant foods apply to PBMAs. These products are heavily processed, often high in sodium, and contain lower levels of compounds (e.g., fiber, resistant starch, polyphenols) typically associated with the benefits of plant-based diets. On the other hand, PBMAs are excellent sources of protein, and many are fortified with nutrients of concern in plant-based diets. Collectively, the evidence suggests that while they may not provide all the benefits of whole legumes, PBMAs have health and environmental advantages over comparable animal-derived foods. For most individuals, a daily serving of a PBMA fits well within the context of an overall healthy diet. Higher intakes may also be compatible with healthy eating, especially for those whose protein and/or calorie needs are increased.

Indexed as

environmentlegumesplant-based meatultra-processed foodsvegetarian

Identifiers

PMID40837435
PMCPMC12362719

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.