ArticleJournal of human kinetics2025
International Standards for the 12-Minute Cooper Test on a Concept 2 Rowing Ergometer: Validity and Reliability of the Test.
Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop international standards for evaluating strength endurance abilities with the use of the 12-min Cooper Test on a rowing ergometer (12-MCTRE). The results from 1855 men (1421 from Poland and 434 from Hungary) and 2879 women (2502 from Poland and 412 from Hungary) aged 19-25 (mean age of 19.98 ± 1.04 and 20.36 ± 0.94, respectively) were collated between 2004 and 2020. The results were expressed on a uniform T-score scale for the 12-MCTRE. The validity of the 12-MCTRE was verified on a group of 28 male and 32 female participants based on the registered variables (power [W], energy expenditure [Kcal], training intensity distribution, and sexual dimorphism). On average, men covered a distance of 2535.6 m and women covered a distance of 1581.0 m during the 12-MCTRE. The results of the control group indicate that men covered a significantly (p < 0.001) longer distance (2691.5 m) than women (2116.1 m) in the 12-MCTRE, and the values of the remaining variables (power, energy expenditure, pace/500 m, and HR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.