ReviewHealth science reports2025
Virtual-Based Prenatal Care Methods and Their Reported Outcomes-A Scoping Review.
Review in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The use of virtual technologies in prenatal care has significantly increased, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, the implications of this approach remain a topic of discussion. This review aimed to categorize virtual-based prenatal care methods and their reported clinical and nonclinical outcomes. Methods: This scoping review was conducted by searching the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, SID, Irandoc, Magiran databases, and Google Scholar search engine from January 2005 to February 2021 and completed until December 2023. Our included studies were quantitative and review studies in English that mentioned virtual prenatal care and related outcomes. We followed the narrative approach for presenting and synthesizing results and PRISMA-ScR guidelines for the accompanying explanation. Results: After retrieving 1324 studies and removing duplicates, 35 articles were reviewed. We divided virtual-based prenatal care into two main categories: only using virtual methods and modified care models by virtual methods. Mhealth was the most widely used virtual care method due to its accessibility to most mothers, low cost, and use of dedicated apps. The reported outcomes were also classified into seven subcategories. Maternal and neonatal outcomes, maternal and provider satisfaction, and change in patient knowledge, attitude, and practice were the three most commonly reported outcomes. Conclusion: Improvement of a variety of clinical and nonclinical outcomes is anticipated to facilitate the effective implementation of tailored virtual interventions for mothers, ultimately improving health outcomes for both mothers and fetuses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.