Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40838044›Full record

Reviewnpj urban sustainability2025

Rethinking trade-offs in nature-based solutions from a multispecies justice perspective.

Katinka Wijsman, Melissa Pineda-Pinto, Simo Sarkki, Charlotte Stijnen, Janneke den Dekker-Arlain, Christopher M Raymond

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in npj urban sustainability, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katinka WijsmanDepartment of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Melissa Pineda-PintoMelbourne Centre for Cities, Faculty of Architecture Building and Planning, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia.
Simo SarkkiCultural Anthropology Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Charlotte StijnenDepartment of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Janneke den Dekker-ArlainDepartment of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Christopher M RaymondHelsinki Institute of Sustainability Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trade-offs in nature-based solutions are increasingly recognized, with novel research interrogating their justice implications. Yet, these trade-offs and justice implications remain entrenched in an anthropocentric orientation, which is problematic in ecological and ethical terms. We discuss four common assumptions on trade-offs in NBS (instrumentalism, neutrality of science, collaborative consensus, and unitemporality) and rethink them through a multispecies justice lens, maintaining that dealing with trade-offs is a form of interspecies politics.

Indexed as

Environmental social sciencesEnvironmental studies

Identifiers

PMID40838044
PMCPMC12360955

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.