ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Voxel-Wise or Region-Wise Nuisance Regression for Functional Connectivity Analyses: Does It Matter?
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Voxel-Wise or Region-Wise Nuisance Regression for Functional Connectivity Analyses: Does It Matter?Human brain mapping · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Removal of nuisance signals (such as motion) from the BOLD time series is an important aspect of preprocessing to obtain meaningful resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC). The nuisance signals are commonly removed using denoising procedures at the finest resolution, that is the voxel time series. Typically, the voxel-wise time series are then aggregated into predefined regions or parcels to obtain an rs-FC matrix as the correlation between pairs of regional time series. Computational efficiency can be improved by denoising the aggregated regional time series instead of the voxel time series. However, a comprehensive comparison of the effects of denoising on these two resolutions is missing. In this study, we systematically investigate the effects of denoising at different time series resolutions (voxel-level and region-level) in 370 unrelated subjects from the HCP-YA dataset. Alongside the time series resolution, we considered additional factors such as aggregation method (Mean and first eigenvariate [EV]) and parcellation granularity (100, 400, and 1000 regions). To assess the effect of those choices on the utility of the resulting whole-brain rs-FC, we evaluated the individual specificity (fingerprinting) and the capacity to predict age and three cognitive scores. Our findings show generally equal or better performance for region-level denoising with notable differences depending on the aggregation method. Using Mean aggregation yielded equal individual specificity and prediction performance for voxel-level and region-level denoising. When EV was employed for aggregation, the individual specificity of voxel-level denoising was reduced compared to region-level denoising. Increasing parcellation granularity generally improved individual specificity. For the prediction of age and cognitive test scores, only fluid intelligence indicated worse performance for voxel-level denoising in the case of aggregating with the EV. Based on these results, we recommend the adoption of region-level denoising for brain-behavior investigations when using Mean aggregation. This approach offers equal individual specificity and prediction capacity with reduced computational resources for the analysis of rs-FC patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.