Observational studyEuropean journal of public health2025
Sickness absence with common mental disorders and antidepressant prescriptions across different employment branches during as compared to before the Covid-19 pandemic-an observational study covering the Swedish population aged 18-65 years.
Observational study in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Few studies have examined the implications of the Covid-19 pandemic on mental health across different employment branches. This study investigated the impact of the pandemic on long-term sickness absence (SA) with common mental disorders (CMDs) and antidepressant prescriptions in different employment branches and age groups in Sweden. Using national registers, we observed the Swedish population (18-65 years) with gainful employment quarterly from 2018 to 2021. An interrupted time-series design was employed to examine changes in trends of incidence rates (IRs) for (i) long-term (>90 days) SA with CMDs and for (ii) antidepressant prescriptions across eight employment branches during versus pre-pandemic. Analyses were stratified by age group. There was no evidence of outcome changes in the entire working age population. However, compared to pre-pandemic levels, the IRs of long-term SA with CMD increased by 5.9% per quarter for those working in the cultural sector [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2%-9.8%], 3.4% in trade and transportation (95% CI: 0.4%-6.4%), and 5.5% in manufacturing and services (95% CI: 1.5%-9.7%) as well as among individuals aged 56-64. Incident antidepressant prescription rates were marginally higher for workers in construction (1.1% annual increase; 95% CI: 0.1%-2.1%), culture (1.4%; 0.7%-2.0%), and trade and transportation (0.9%; 0.1%-1.7%). While the risk of CMD-related long-term SA or incident antidepressant prescription in Swedish workers did not appear to be impacted by the pandemic, certain employment branches and older individuals were negatively affected in terms of both outcomes. Targeted countermeasures and initiatives to improve well-being are necessary for vulnerable groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.