SynthesisInternational journal of clinical oncology2025
A systematic review and meta-analysis of x-ray therapy versus proton beam therapy for pediatric central nervous system germ cell tumors: TRP-Germinoma 2025.
Synthesis in International journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCentral nervous system germ cell tumors (CNS-GCTs) are rare pediatric tumors, categorized into germinomas and non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs). Proton-beam therapy (PBT) has been introduced as an alternative to X-ray therapy (XRT) for minimizing radiation exposure to normal brain tissue, but evidence comparing these treatment modalities is limited.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines was conducted using PubMed for studies published between 1990 and 2022. Studies reporting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for CNS-GCTs treated with PBT or XRT were included. Random-effects meta-analyses compared 3- and 5-year OS and PFS between treatment modalities.
resultsForty-one studies were selected, with 36 on XRT and five on PBT. In germinoma patients, no significant differences were found between XRT and PBT for 3-year OS (95.3% vs 97.8%, p = 0.3158), 5-year OS (94.8% vs 97.8%, p = 0.3088), 3-year PFS (90.7% vs 97.1%, p = 0.1045), or 5-year PFS (89.2% vs 91.7%, p = 0.4676). The collected data were insufficient to evaluate PBT in NGGCTs.
conclusionPBT and XRT showed comparable survival outcomes in germinoma. Further research is required to explore PBT's potential benefits in preserving cognitive function or reducing secondary cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.