Trial reportPain2025
Investigating the potential of minocycline in reducing brain inflammation in chronic low back pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled mechanistic clinical trial.
Trial report in Pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glial cells in neuropathic pain.Physiological reviews · 2026Review
- Neuro-Immune Crosstalk: Molecular Mechanisms, Biological Functions, Diseases, and Therapeutic Targets.MedComm · 2026Review
- Microglia Polarization: A Key Regulatory Mechanism of Neuropathic Pain.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Mechanical cues as immunomodulators in neuroinflammation-driven spinal sensitization: analgesic mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Neuroinflammatory mechanisms and pharmacological advances in autism spectrum disorder: from inflammatory pathways to targeted interventions.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Microbiota in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: evidence and opportunities.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Article
- Evidence for a role of skull bone marrow in human chronic pain as revealed by TSPO PET imaging.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractOur group has shown that translocator protein (TSPO) levels, a putative marker of neuroinflammation, are increased in the brain and spinal cord of patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP). Whether neuroinflammation might be a therapeutic target for this condition is unknown. In this phase II double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, we sought to evaluate whether the tetracycline antibiotic minocycline, which is commonly used as a glial inhibitor in preclinical models, has an effect on brain TSPO levels in adults with cLBP. Participants randomly received 100-mg minocycline or placebo, once a day for 2 weeks. The primary outcome was the change (pretreatment vs posttreatment) in thalamic TSPO levels, measured using [11C]PBR28 positron emission tomography signal (standardized uptake value ratio) and analyzed with a mixed effect model. Secondary outcome measures included the change in Brief Pain Inventory, severity subscore. Among 60 enrolled participants, 48 completed the trial. Of these, 25 received minocycline (age [years], mean ± SD: 44.6 ± 16.9; 9 female), and 23 received placebo (49 ± 17.1; 9 female). The mean thalamic positron emission tomography standard uptake value ratio was very stable across visits in both groups, with no significant group-by-time interaction (P = 0.956). Similarly, both groups demonstrated a comparable decrease over time in Brief Pain Inventory severity scores (P = 0.018) and no significant group-by-time interaction (P = 0.329). Our results suggest that minocycline, at the tested regimen, may neither reduce brain TSPO levels nor have clinically meaningful effects on clinical pain in patients with cLBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.