Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40840937›Full record

ArticleHealthcare informatics research2025

In-Context Learning with Large Language Models: A Simple and Effective Approach to Improve Radiology Report Labeling.

Songsoo Kim, Donghyun Kim, Jaewoong Kim, Jalim Koo, Jinsik Yoon, Dukyong Yoon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Songsoo KimDepartment of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Donghyun KimDepartment of Radiology, Central Draft Physical Examination Office of Military Manpower Administration, Daegu, Korea.
Jaewoong KimDepartment of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jalim KooDepartment of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jinsik YoonDepartment of Integrative Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Dukyong YoonDepartment of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development InstituteMinistry of Health and Welfare HI22C0452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study assessed the effectiveness of in-context learning using Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4 (GPT-4) for labeling radiology reports.

methodsIn this retrospective study, radiology reports were obtained from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database. Two structured prompts-the "basic prompt" and the "in-context prompt"- were compared. An optimization experiment was conducted to assess consistency and the occurrence of output format errors. The primary labeling experiments were performed on 200 unseen head computed tomography (CT) reports for multilabel classification of predefined labels (Experiment 1) and on 400 unseen abdominal CT reports for multi-label classification of actionable findings (Experiment 2).

resultsThe inter-reader accuracies in Experiments 1 and 2 were 0.93 and 0.84, respectively. For multi-label classification of head CT reports (Experiment 1), the in-context prompt led to notable increases in F1-scores for the "foreign body" and "mass" labels (gains of 0.66 and 0.22, respectively). However, improvements for other labels were modest. In multi-label classification of abdominal CT reports (Experiment 2), in-context prompts produced substantial improvements in F1-scores across all labels compared to basic prompts. Providing context equipped the model with domain-specific knowledge and helped align its existing knowledge, thereby improving performance.

conclusionsIncontext learning with GPT-4 consistently improved performance in labeling radiology reports. This approach is particularly effective for subjective labeling tasks and allows the model to align its criteria with those of human annotators for objective labeling. This practical strategy offers a simple, adaptable, and researcher-oriented method that can be applied to diverse labeling tasks.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputer-Assisted DiagnosisMedical InformaticsNatural Language ProcessingRadiology

Identifiers

PMID40840937
PMCPMC12370419

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.