Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40841502›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026

Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy, stroma fraction, and nucleotyping in stage IIIb colon cancer and their implications for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Weili Zhang, Yuxin Gu, Xiajuan Xue, Xudan Li, Weifeng Wang, Ruowei Wang, Jiahua He, Weihao Li, Yue Xing, Yuguang Lin and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Weili Zhang *Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Yuxin Gu *Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Xiajuan Xue *Department of Colorectal Surgery, Zhangzhou Municipal Hospital Affiliated of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, 363000, People's Republic of China.
Xudan Li *Oncology Department of Kangmei Hospital, Puning, Guangdong, 515300, People's Republic of China.
Weifeng WangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Ruowei WangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Jiahua HeDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Weihao LiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Yue XingBreast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China. xingy28@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Yuguang LinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518036, People's Republic of China. 31550662@qq.com.
Jianhong PengDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China. pengjh@sysucc.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0769-8195

Funding

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province 2025A1515012742Beijing Xisike Clinical Oncology Research Foundation Y-Gilead2024-PT-0006Science and Technology Planning Project of Shenzen Municipality JCYJ20220531094015034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA ploidy (P), stroma fraction (S), and nucleotyping (N), collectively known as PSN, have demonstrated prognostic accuracy in various stages of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the prognostic value of the PSN panel in stage IIIb colon cancer patients receiving CapOX adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. PATIENTS AND

methodsPostoperative pathological samples from stage IIIb colon cancer patients who underwent radical surgery and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were retrospectively collected. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were performed to compare survival among subgroups of patients stratified by PSN, in order to elucidate the benefits of different durations of adjuvant CapOX chemotherapy.

resultThe PSN low-risk group had the highest 5-year DFS (95.77% vs. 83.07% vs. 84.29%, P = 0.023). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified primary tumor location (HR = 4.166, 95% CI 1.616-10.742, P = 0.003), perineural invasion (HR = 2.358, 95% CI 1.205-4.615, P = 0.012), and PSN high risk (HR = 3.830, 95% CI 1.352-10.853, P = 0.011) as independent predictors of DFS. No significant difference in 5-year DFS and overall survival (OS) was observed between patients receiving 4-7 cycles and those receiving 8 cycles of CapOX (DFS: 86.24% vs. 88.77%, P = 0.082; OS: 96.38% vs. 94.23%, P = 0.088). However, in the PSN high-risk group, completing 8 cycles of CapOX significantly improved 5-year DFS and OS compared to 4-7 cycles (DFS: 93.10% vs. 77.04%, P = 0.033; OS: 96.30% vs. 91.24%, P = 0.037). In contrast, no significant difference in DFS was observed in the IDEA (International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant therapy)-based high-risk group (DFS: 85.85% vs. 80.75%, P = 0.062; OS: 97.56% vs. 87.05%, P = 0.598).

conclusionThe PSN panel effectively stratifies stage IIIb colon cancer, aiding in optimized adjuvant chemotherapy duration determination.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsColonic NeoplasmsDNA, NeoplasmPloidiesStromal CellsAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantCyclophosphamideFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOxaliplatinPrognosisCyclophosphamideDNA, NeoplasmOxaliplatinColon cancerDNA ploidyNucleotypingPrognosisStroma fraction

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.