Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40841559›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Improving computational drug repositioning through multi-source disease similarity networks.

Duc-Hau Le

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Investigation of the Anti-Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Duc-Hau LeSchool of Information and Communications Technology, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, No. 1 Dai Co Viet, Hai Ba Trung, Hanoi, Vietnam. hauld@soict.hust.edu.vn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational drug repositioning seeks to identify new therapeutic uses for existing or experimental drugs. Network-based methods are effective as they integrate relationships among drugs, diseases, and target proteins/genes into prediction models. However, traditional approaches often rely on a single phenotype-based disease similarity network, limiting the diversity of disease information. In this study, we constructed three disease similarity networks-phenotypic, ontological, and molecular-using data from OMIM, Human Phenotype Ontology annotations, and gene interaction network, respectively. These were integrated into disease multiplex networks and multiplex-heterogeneous networks. We applied a tailored Random Walk with Restart (RWR) algorithm to predict novel drug-disease associations. Experimental results show that both disease multiplex and multiplex-heterogeneous networks outperform their single-layer counterparts in leave-one-out cross-validation. Using 10-fold cross-validation, our method, MHDR, outperformed the state-of-the-art methods TP-NRWRH, DDAGDL and RGLDR, demonstrating the advantage of integrating multiple disease similarity networks. We predicted novel drug-disease associations by ranking candidates, identifying 68 associations supported by shared proteins/genes, 1,064 by shared pathways, and 84 by shared protein complexes, with many validated by clinical trials, underscoring the practical impact of our approach.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDrug RepositioningAlgorithmsGene Regulatory NetworksHumansDisease multiplex networksDrug repositioningMultiplex-Heterogeneous networksMulti-Source disease similarity networksRandom walk with restart (RWR)

Identifiers

PMID40841559
PMCPMC12371050

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.