Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40841871›Full record

ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Dietary Recommendations for Body Mass and Composition Manipulation in Male and Female Athletes: a Scoping Review of Consensus Statements, Position Stands and Practice Guidelines from International Expert Groups.

Lauren V Delany, Nessan Costello, Ben Jones, Susan H Backhouse

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lauren V DelanyCarnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Headingley Campus, Leeds, LS6 3QU, UK. l.delany@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.ORCID 0009-0009-6969-9415
Nessan CostelloCarnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Headingley Campus, Leeds, LS6 3QU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6046-7986
Ben JonesCarnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Headingley Campus, Leeds, LS6 3QU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4274-6236
Susan H BackhouseCarnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Headingley Campus, Leeds, LS6 3QU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4810-5173

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBody mass and composition (fat and fat-free mass) manipulation is a common practice in sport, yet it can pose significant risks to athlete health and wellbeing. Practitioners must continually adapt to the growing body of evidence to implement safe, effective and context-specific practice.

objectiveThis scoping review aimed to summarise dietary recommendations for altering body mass or composition in male and female, adult non-disabled athletes and appraise how these expert-group led recommendations have evolved over time.

methodsElectronic databases, including SCOPUS, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL Complete and APA PsycINFO were searched (last search 2 August 2024) without date restrictions. Papers were included if they provided dietary recommendations for altering body mass or composition in adult non-disabled athlete populations and were published by an expert organisation.

resultsFrom 6068 records screened, 73 documents were included, comprising 45 consensus statements, 27 position stands and 1 practice guideline, endorsed by 14 organisations and developed by 328 experts from 25 countries. Athletics (n = 19), aquatics (n = 7) and team sports (n = 5) were the most represented, leaving many sports underrepresented. A total of 50 documents were standalone rather than part of an updated series. Only 40 papers addressed specific targets, rates or timing of outcome changes. Individualised, realistic and health-focussed targets were recommended, aligned with the athlete's sport, position, sex, age and competition phase, with gradual changes (e.g. 0.5-1.0 kg/week fat loss) to enhance performance. Common strategies for altering body mass and composition included creating an energy surplus (500-1000 kcal/day) or deficit (250-1000 kcal/day), maintaining energy availability above 30 kcal/kg fat-free mass/day, and periodising carbohydrate intake (3-12 g/kg/day) on the basis of training demands. Protein intake (1.6-2.4 g/kg/day) was recommended across 4-6 feeds from high-quality sources, alongside targeted supplements such as creatine, whey protein and a multi-vitamin and mineral. Recommendations focussed minimal attention on nutrients such as fats, fibre or micronutrients, and the language used was often vague, leaving significant room for interpretation.

conclusionsDeveloping sport-specific, behaviourally anchored and regularly updated dietary recommendations, informed by athlete and multidisciplinary team input, is recommended. This approach would provide actionable, athlete-centred strategies that effectively support body composition goals whilst prioritising health, wellbeing and performance. OSF Registration https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B4YJT.

Indexed as

AthletesBody CompositionBody Mass IndexDietSports Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaConsensusFemaleHumansMalePractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID40841871
PMCPMC12513969

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.