ArticleBiophysical journal2025
Bayesian analysis and efficient algorithms for single-molecule fluorescence data and step counting.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol for Nanodisc single-molecule pull-down assay to detect protein-lipid interactions.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- Quantitative Assessment of Biological Dynamics with Aggregate Data.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the growing adoption of single-molecule fluorescence experiments, there is an increasing demand for efficient statistical methodologies and accurate analysis of the acquired measurements. Existing analysis frameworks, such as those that use kinetic models, often rely on strong assumptions on the dynamics of the molecules and fluorophores under study that render them inappropriate for general purpose step counting applications, especially when the systems of study exhibit uncharacterized dynamics. Here, we propose a novel Bayesian nonparametric framework to analyze single-molecule fluorescence data that is kinetic model independent. For the evaluation of our methods, we develop four Markov Chain Monte Carlo samplers, ranging from elemental to highly sophisticated, and demonstrate that the added complexity is essential for accurate data analysis. We apply our methods to experimental data obtained from total internal reflection fluorescent photobleaching assays of the EphA2 receptor tagged with GFP. In addition, we validate our approach with synthetic data mimicking realistic conditions and demonstrate its ability to recover ground truth under high- and low-signal/noise ratio data, establishing it as a versatile tool for fluorescence data analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.