ArticleExperimental physiology2026
Mapping the variability of in vivo rat uterine electrical properties throughout the oestrous cycle.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping the variability of in vivo rat uterine electrical properties throughout the oestrous cycle.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
After reaching sexual maturity, uterine function is driven by cyclical variations in hormone levels. The electrical and mechanical activity in the uterus varies during the menstrual cycle, contributing to essential functions such as sperm transport and shedding the menstrual lining. However, there is a lack of quantification of the variation in uterine function occurring over the course of the cycle. Female Wistar rats were used to quantify the changes in uterine electrical activity in vivo with respect to the oestrous cycle. Under anaesthesia, the uterus was exteriorised, and electrodes were placed on the dorsal and ventral sides of the organ to record spontaneous activity from the serosa. Electrical events were separated into slow and fast components based on frequency. The duration and interval between events were measured and propagation directions and velocities were mapped along the uterus using high spatial resolution electrode arrays. All stages of the oestrous cycle showed ovarian-cervical propagation, but cervical-ovarian propagation was also present in pro-oestrus and metoestrus. Ovarian-cervical propagation was dominant in oestrus and metoestrus. The interval between events showed significant differences with 40.2 ± 5.6 s (1.51 ± 0.25 cpm) and 60.5 ± 2.6 s (1.02 ± 0.05 cpm) during the dioestrus and metoestrus phases, respectively (P < 0.001). The slow and fast component durations were similar across the oestrous cycle (19.9 ± 2.2 s and 10.2 ± 3.0 s, respectively). This emphasizes the role of the oestrous cycle in guiding uterine function through modulation of the electrical activity and shows potential for estimating the oestrous cycle phases based on electrical characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.