ArticleCureus2025
Detecting Portal Venous Blood Flow in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease Using Non-Invasive Doppler Ultrasound.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is the most common liver disease and is associated with metabolic syndrome, obesity, and insulin resistance. MAFLD has been shown to produce changes in portal venous blood velocity and portal pressure before the development of cirrhosis. Accurate measurement of portal venous blood flow is essential for early detection of portal hypertension and assessing fibrosis risk. In this study, we aim to evaluate non-invasive transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound versus invasive direct techniques for detecting portal venous blood flow changes in a rat model of MAFLD. Methods We induced MAFLD in rats by a high-fat diet (HFD). Male Sprague Dawley rats (n=16) were housed in pairs under standard conditions (12-hour light/dark cycle, temperature-controlled environment at 20-23°C) with ad libitum access to water. After a two-day acclimation period, rats were divided into standard chow diet (STD) and HFD groups (n=8 each) for 10 weeks. Portal venous blood flow was first measured non-invasively via transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound and then directly using a flow probe during terminal surgery. Additionally, peak portal venous blood flow was compared between fed and fasted states (n=3 each) using non-invasive ultrasound. Animals were randomized to the order of testing and were anesthetized prior to ultrasound using isoflurane. Each measurement was collected in triplicate by same operator and averaged. Results Direct measurements indicated significantly higher portal venous blood flow in HFD rats (23.4 ± 2.8 mL/min) compared to STD rats (18.0 ± 2.4 mL/min, p<0.05). However, non-invasive Doppler ultrasound did not show significant differences between HFD (13.2 ± 1.0 mL/min) and STD (12.5 ± 1.8 mL/min, p=0.74). Importantly, transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound detected a significant increase in peak portal venous blood flow in the fed state (213.9 ± 24.9 mL/min) versus the fasted state (125.5 ± 24.1 mL/min, p<0.05). Conclusion Non-invasive Doppler ultrasound did not detect absolute portal flow differences between HFD and STD rats but successfully identified feeding-state changes. This suggests potential use in monitoring hemodynamic changes, though further refinement and validation in larger models are needed for clinical application. Limitations include a small sample size, particularly in the fed versus fasted analysis, and the exclusive use of male rats. The accuracy of transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound was hindered by technical challenges, including difficulty imaging small vessels, operator dependency, and assumptions about vessel geometry. Additionally, non-invasive measurements significantly underestimated actual flow compared to invasive methods. These factors limit the generalizability and clinical translation of the findings, underscoring the need for further validation in larger animal models and refinement of imaging techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.