ReviewCureus2025
Neuroprotective Agents With Reperfusion Therapies in Ischemic Stroke: Evidence From Recent Randomized Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mechanism-informed neuroprotection in acute ischemic stroke treated with thrombectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Diabetes Mellitus and Stroke: Pathophysiological Connections and Therapeutic Potential of GLP-1 and GLP-1/GIP Receptor Agonists.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness and safety of adjunctive neuroprotective therapies administered in combination with reperfusion treatments, either intravenous (IV) thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, or both, in adult patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search of four major databases was conducted with filters applied to include English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published within the last five years. From an initial 622 records, 10 eligible RCTs were identified and analyzed. Interventions included nerinetide, edaravone (and its derivatives), nelonemdaz, cerebrolysin, minocycline, glyceryl trinitrate, and normobaric hyperoxia. Functional outcomes were primarily measured using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), infarct volume, and safety endpoints such as symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Among the findings, normobaric hyperoxia showed the most consistent benefit in reducing infarct size and improving functional outcomes, while agents such as nerinetide and edaravone demonstrated mixed results. Quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) 2.0 tool revealed low to moderate risk of bias across most studies. Although the evidence remains heterogeneous, this review highlights the potential role of neuroprotective agents as adjuncts to reperfusion therapy and identifies promising directions for future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.